CV

Full professor (Tenured) for Business Administration with a focus on Information Systems

  •  since 09/2024

Welcome Ceremony for New Professors, Picture with Vice-Rector Weihs, Kathrin Figl, Rector Sexl, Dean Ostendorf, Vice-Rector Walde (from left to right) Copyright: University of Innsbruck

Copyright: University of Innsbruck

Associate professor (Tenured) for Business Administration with a focus on Information Systems

  •  since 02/2023

Welcome Ceremony for New Professors, University of Innsbruck: Picture with Rector Univ.-Prof.in Dr.in Veronika Sexl and Vice Rector Univ.-Prof. Dr. Bernhard Fügenschuh

 

Assistant professor for Business Administration with a focus on Information Systems (Tenure Track)

    •  since 08/2021

Professor for Business Administration with a focus on Information Systems

    •  02/2018 – 08/2021

Welcome Ceremony for New Professors, University of Innsbruck: Picture with Rector Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Tilmann Märk and Dean Univ.-Prof. Dr. Matthias Bank, Copyright: University of Innsbruck

 

Habilitation (Venia Legendi) in Information Systems (Wirtschaftsinformatik)

    • Topic “Cognitive Effectiveness in Conceptual Modelling”
    • Submitted in 06/2017, Defended in 01/2018

 Prof.  Jan Recker, Prof. Jan Mendling and Prof. Hajo Reijers at my habilitation defense

Doctoral Programme (Ph.D.) in Information Systems

  • Summa cum laude (Grade point average: 1.0)
  • Dissertation: “Developing Team Competence of Computer Science Students in Person Centered Technology-Enhanced Courses”

doktorat

Bachelor and Master (B.A., M.A.) in Information Systems

  • Summa cum laude (Grade point average: 1.0)
  • Academic Excellence Scholarship in 2002/03
  • Master thesis: “Evaluation of e-Learning”

master-wi

Master (M.A.) in Psychology

  • Summa cum laude (Grade point average: 1.2)
  • Academic Excellence Scholarship in 2002/03
  • Master thesis: “Usability of Statistical Software – Comparing SPSS and STATISTICA Using Isonorm and Isometrics”

psychology
In Austria, a 5-point grading scale is used, 1 ( “Excellent”) is the best possible grade, 5 (“unsatisfactory”) the lowest.